That is the number one question that homeschoolers ask when they first meet, after “Hi, what’s your name?” and “Which of these wild hooligans are yours?” The third rail of American homeschooling is the number one question every homeschooler wants answered. If answered carefully, everything will be fine. Fumble the answer and you might find yourself in an academic mosh pit. Homeschoolers identify themselves by three main categories: secular versus religious, method of instruction (i.e. classroom model, Charlotte Mason, classical, eclectic, unschooler, etc.), and curriculum source. I don’t get myself wrapped around the axel over those identities. In fact, I am so unconcerned that I allowed another homeschooler to pick our math curriculum this year. Now, how cool is that?!
This year was the first year that The Boss and I struggled over our curriculum choices. Well, at least The Boss did. Math is her department. She has the math degree. She’s the person who teaches upper level math in our house. I trust her judgment. We have an unspoken agreement. I don’t question her about math. She doesn’t question me about Shakespeare, either the Riverside or Pelican editions (of which I own both). I supported her efforts while she diligently researched geometry curriculum for General Mayhem by keeping the volume muted while I channel surfed. The Boss narrowed our choices to Jacobs geometry and the new Saxon math geometry book. With reasons to like and dislike each one, we withheld judgment until we could place our hands on an actual copy of Jacobs Geometry (we had already viewed the Saxon book), something we were unable to do while visiting two homeschooling conventions this year.
Enter the world’s greatest blogging partner.
With half an hour remaining at the Schaumberg Homeschooling Convention, we sat down across a table from Linda, our stalwart Alpha Omega sales rep, blogging partner, and new friend, convinced her to stop surfing Twitter, and asked her to talk to us about Alpha Omega’s geometry curriculum. Ten minutes later I heard words that I never thought would escape from The Boss. Flipping through a LIFEPAC geometry book, the woman who once gleefully announced to a crowded convention hall the reason why she hated LIFEPAC materials actually said, “This isn’t bad. Not bad at all. I kinda like this.” When she discovered that the box set of LIFEPAC geometry only cost $62.95, half the cost of Saxon’s $116.00 geometry set and a third of the cost of Jacobs $178.85 curriculum set, we knew we had a strong contender. We decided to return home, make a decision the following week, and purchase our choice. I knew we were leaning strongly towards LIFEPAC. Our only concern was whether or not we could get Alpha Omega to give Linda credit for the sale if we called the order in a few days later. Both Linda’s and Alpha Omega’s generosity still has my wife and I at a loss for words. We are grateful for this blessing and we thank you both for sending it our way. I will be reviewing this curriculum set during this school year. At first glance we see that the material is competitively priced while offering math instruction that appeals to a mathematician who wants clear, straightforward, rigorous math instruction without tricks, gimmicks, and flashy graphics. I knew Linda’s choice was good when I showed it to the General. “That’s twice as big as the set I used last year!” he complained. When you’re 14, the weight of your curriculum means far more than the content. It must be good.
Now, how cool is that?!
